🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities allow or withhold as they see fit. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine when and where protests can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you likely can't establish limits at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing Palestine Action, a non-violent, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for holding placards against mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how casually we permitted them to be eroded.