🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.