🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from accessing video footage of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the regulator applied to the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. It first determined the content was "refused classification", a designation that empowered the commissioner to order platforms to restrict access to the videos for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of public importance that generated extensive public discourse". The platform drew a parallel between the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel revised the classification of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Opinion

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the post was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as that footage was released years after the assassination, "after public sentiment around the matter had subsided".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the ruling.

"X fought this case to defend free speech and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator also welcomed the board's decision, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on such content in accordance with their existing community guidelines.